Here is the early December update on the status of the test
cases.
Description
|
Current
|
Other
|
Fully Paid
|
Charged Off
|
Index
|
Test 1 End in 2017
|
2%
|
1%
|
93%
|
4%
|
96.0
|
Test 2 End in 12 months
|
75%
|
0%
|
25%
|
0%
|
97.3
|
Test 3 LC Picks
|
90%
|
5%
|
5%
|
0%
|
98.8
|
Test 4 Zip Grade
|
95%
|
5%
|
0%
|
0%
|
99.4
|
Test 5 By Percent
|
90%
|
5%
|
5%
|
0%
|
95.6
|
Test 6 By Funded
|
93%
|
5%
|
3%
|
0%
|
99.5
|
Test 7 Random
|
95%
|
0%
|
5%
|
0%
|
98.6
|
Test 8 FOLIOfn Zip Grade
|
89%
|
0%
|
11%
|
0%
|
100.0
|
Test case 1 are notes that I purchased early in 2017 from
the secondary market FOLIOfn. They were selected randomly with the two criteria
that they had to end in 2017 and were selling at a slight discount. Most have been paid off by now, although 6
were charged off. There must have been some bad circumstances for someone to
default on a loan after paying for several years. There are still 4 outstanding
(1 in the grace period). These should close out this month and I’ll be able to
estimate the return on this approach.
Test case 2 has the same type of notes as test case 1 except
that they don’t pay off until mid-2018. Some have been paid of and none have
defaulted. The index of these notes is slightly higher than test case 1.
(Recall the index is an attempt to measure the flow of payments received versus the
ideal situation. Early paid offs and defaults lower this number.)
Test case 3 are notes recommended by LC Picks, a 3rd
party service. They are doing reasonably well, although 1 is in the grace
period and another 1-30 days late.
Test case 4 were selected using the borrowers zip code area
and the loan grade as described in an earlier posting. These are performing
well with only 1 in the grace period.
Test cases 5-7 were new notes purchased on the day they
became first available within and hour or two of their posting. Test case 5
were notes chosen with a high percent of their funding completed, test case 6
were notes selected by a high amount invested, and test case 7 were randomly
picked during the same time period. All have had a couple paid off and no
defaults. But the random group is the only one with currently no potential
problems. One note was apparently fraud,
none of the first 3 payments were made. A second made 1 of the first 3
payments. Obviously, defaults will occur.
Test case 8 (buying notes from FOLIOfn that met my zip/grade
criteria) is working well. But I could find so few of these, I decided to quit
looking.
Maybe I’ll update the table at the end of the year. Follow
me on Twitter, @billlanke, to know when I do this.
No comments:
Post a Comment